Uneasiness due to the blockade of stream-ripping sites by YouTube

Post by Jammaz - 30th July, 2019


“PIRACY” the most feared word among the creative genre because of which the artists do not get proper recognition or royalty of their work. One of the most cliché effects is on the music industry. Data reveals that stream ripping remains the music industry's main piracy threat and its growing at a rapid rate.
Though, free music is easy to find nowadays. YouTube and different online music app can find millions of tracks including many of the most recent releases for you. Before knowing further we have to considerate and take into account about the core concept of stream-ripping.
The effect of online piracy on innovation and the creation of new, authentic businesses. While denoted only as a legal matter, online piracy has shown to be an essential source of technological and strategic innovation to both industry contemporaries and newcomers.
The perceived value of music is also a factor in stream-ripping and music infringement. This has been an issue in the industry since Napster came into the scene. Kantar Media's study found that young, middle-class males are the most likely to use stream-ripping services. 41% of people in Kantar Media's study said they either could not afford the cost or felt that music was 1 Testing: Stream Ripping: A Copyright Infringement Epidemic Published by Scholarly Commons, 2019 overpriced. This devaluation of music is especially dangerous for rights owners in the industry. Although freemium ad revenue is significantly less than what is made from subscription services, it is the most widely used method of music consumption.
Offering music for free would dramatically change the business model of the industry. A whole source of revenue is essentially lost and that money has to be made up for in other revenue streams to keep the industry profitable. In general, live music experiences are doing well. By increasing the promotion of tour dates or extending tours, the revenue generated in this area could offset what was previously made in downloads and streams.
 

Stream ripping
Stream ripping involves ripping a track from a streaming platform before converting it into a downloadable file that the user can use offline for as long as they want. To understand stream-ripping, you need to understand what constitutes a streaming platform. These are services such as YouTube, Netflix, Amazon Music, Spotify, and various sports streaming services that offer music and video online. 

 

How Does Stream Ripping Work?
Stream ripping requires software that can save the streaming media to a file so that you can access locally on your computer. It's also known as de streaming. Some software uses the website link (or URL) of the streaming media and records it from there. Others are even simpler than that, merely capturing the content from your desktop as if it were a screencast. YouTube is one of the most commonly used streaming services by stream rippers as it has such a wealth of different content. However, there are also tools for Spotify, Apple Music, and various other popular streaming platforms. Along with the increasing popularity of streaming as the main method of music, consumption has come the increase in new ways to get music illegally. Between 2014 and 2016, the use of stream-ripping services almost doubled according to a report by Incopro, a brand infringement, and protection software company. In the report, it was found that the motivations and reasons for stream-ripping vary.

 

Why Do People Use Stream Ripping Software?
One survey found that people come up with many excuses for why they rip streams. Some say they already own the music in another format, while others want to be able to listen to it offline. Another reason cited is that they can't afford to pay for it. Ultimately though, it's still affecting artistic industries and potentially stalling creativity. 
There are currently many stream-ripping applications and software that allow the user to create and store MP3 files of a broadcast. The broadcaster will not be able to take into account or even know that the user is recording the stream. In contrast with logging on to a peer-to-peer network and downloading tracks, the ripping seems more appealing. With stream ripping, there is no trace as to the act. All the broadcaster has is the listener's IP number, which doesn't identify whether the user listens to the stream or recording it.

 

What Legal Issues Are There?
Making an unauthorized copy of someone's intellectual property is copyright theft. Stream ripping is the fastest growing form of infringement according to the 2016 Music Consumer Insight Report published by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. While it's seen as a victimless crime by many, that's far from the truth. It's still a form of theft and negatively affects many professionals. It's difficult to quantify how many millions of tracks are ripped this way, but musicians, performers, and music distributors are certainly taking a hit on royalties. Much of that is because individual streams are fractions of cents, but they add up fast. 

 

The recent problem for stream rippers
YOUTUBE has blocked the numerous stream-ripping sites due to the continuous complaint from the music industry and contemporaries as there is a major threat to the creative and hard-earned work of artists. Which is one sense a great initiative by YouTube to reduce the online piracy of creativity. Some artists deliberately share their work, the major record labels don’t want tracks to leak outside YouTube’s ecosystem. For this reason, they see YouTube-to-MP3-rippers as a major threat to their creative work.
YouTube has expanded access to a rich spectrum of televisual material and suggests the potential for democratization of media memories and flows. Yet, the site also invents new ways to regulate and restrict access to such content under the face of enforcing copyright.
The music industry has long griped about suffering collateral damage from YouTube's massive scale and influence. Stream-ripping piracy -- which circumvents YouTube encryption to morph music from a streaming video into a download you can listen to offline for free -- has worried the music industry as it has grown. It's one of several complaints that recording companies, artists and others have about the Google-owned video giant.
The stream-ripping site notes that the decision was taken voluntarily and not after it was contacted directly by rights holders or YouTube. 
Numerous operators of YouTube-to-MP3 rippers have alleged that the streaming service is actively restricting requests from their sites.
“All my servers are blocked with error ‘HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests’,” the operator of Dlnowsoft.com informs TorrentFreak. As for now, the stream-ripping site currently shows a “service temporarily unavailable, we will come back soon” error message.

The site in question is not alone. Mp3-youtube.download, another stream-ripper, is facing a similar issue. According to its operator, something changed yesterday evening and users now see a ‘this URL does not exist’ error message when they try to convert a YouTube clip. One of the major stream-ripping sites is also facing the same problem to convert the desired music fringe. 

 

Above are the prompts which are being shown by YouTube to the stream ripper’s sites.

For instance, this isn't the most uplifting development in human history. Like any service provider, there is a certain amount of instinct in wanting to retain control over one's product. Stream-ripping sites route around the control YouTube would otherwise have.
That being said, it's an odd move for a company that used to tout a mantra of "Don't be evil." After all, it will not take a lot of work or thought to argue convincingly that extracting the ability for people to fore say educational materials on the go, such as I do, is some level of bad, if not evil. On top of that, how about any artist or content creator who might enjoy the fact that their material can be made audibly available in this manner? Though, the number of people that comes in such a category is not zero. 

None of the site operators we heard from was warned by YouTube in advance. The reports reached out to the video streaming service for comment and further details but all in vain and not up to the mark.

While YouTube’s effective efforts, preplanned or not, are effective, they will likely ignite a cyclic game. The operator of a popular stream-ripper, who prefers to remain anonymous, managed to counter the blockade by the deployment of several proxy servers. 

 

Alternative for stream-rippers

Apart from the deliberate or incidental effort of YouTube to reduce or stop stream-ripping but 123convert is one of the stream-ripping sites which are continuously working without any fail. So there is no need to take unduly pressure.

123convert converts YouTube to mp3 downloading easily, at this time when people are on verge of unease due to the YouTube initiative to ban stream-ripping 123convert act as an alternative to carry on the downloading.

At last, one can download the contents with the use of 123convert

Your video is being processed!